Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816046›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Correlation between positive biopsy rates and contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings in patients with pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis of percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.

Huanyu Wang, Xiaoyi Yan, Yang Gui, Jing Zhang, Li Tan, Xueqi Chen, Tianjiao Chen, Hua Liang, Ke Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Huanyu WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyi YanDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yang GuiDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Li TanDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xueqi ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tianjiao ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hua LiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ke LvDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous biopsy is a commonly used method for the early pathological diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. As an important imaging modality, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) improves the characterization of pancreatic lesions by assessing microvascular perfusion, thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Although prebiopsy CEUS has been shown to enhance biopsy accuracy and success rates, how its findings directly affect puncture success remains to be fully understood. The study aimed to identify the ultrasound and clinical factors affecting the effectiveness of percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) and evaluate how CEUS perfusion characteristics influence biopsy results to aid pancreatic cancer diagnosis and broaden patient options. Methods: Clinical and imaging data of 814 patients who underwent percutaneous puncture for a pancreatic lesion from January 2018 to December 2023 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively evaluated, and 306 patients were finally enrolled. The pathological results of the biopsy were categorized as negative, suspicious, or positive. Patients were classified into a rich group and a poor group based on the CEUS results. A comparison of the positive biopsy rates between the two groups was conducted. Results: The study enrolled 155 males and 151 females. Among them, 191 (62%) had positive biopsy results, 86 (28%) were classified as suspicious, and 29 (9.5%) had negative results. According to the CEUS result, 61% (186/306) of patients were classified into the poor group, and 39% (120/306) of patients were classified into the rich group. The proportion of patients exhibiting negative biopsy results (15.8%) in the rich group was significantly greater than that observed in the poor group (5.4%) (P=0.001). Multivariate analysis further confirmed the independent influence of CEUS features on biopsy yield [odds ratio (OR) 0.471; P<0.05]. Conclusions: Patients with poor blood supply, as indicated by CEUS, demonstrated a higher positive biopsy rate during percutaneous US-FNA. For patients exhibiting a rich blood supply, increasing the sampling volume or applying histological core needle biopsy (CNB) may enhance diagnostic efficacy.

Indexed as

Biopsycontrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)pancreatic cancerpercutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (percutaneous US-FNA)

Identifiers

PMID41816046
PMCPMC12971329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.