ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Using finite element analysis to obtain the pressure gradient between the left renal vein and the inferior vena cava: a new method for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with nutcracker syndrome.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nutcracker syndrome (NCS) diagnosis remains challenging due to the lack of non-invasive, reliable methods. Current techniques, including Doppler ultrasound and computed tomography angiography (CTA), lack hemodynamic data, with invasive measurement of the left renal vein-inferior vena cava (LRV-IVC) pressure gradient (true pressure gradient, TPG) being the gold standard. This study aimed to validate a novel non-invasive approach using finite element analysis (FEA) to simulate the LRV-IVC pressure gradient (SPG) to assist in diagnosing and monitoring NCS. Methods: This retrospective study included 46 patients (35 NCS, 11 controls) who underwent CTA and invasive TPG measurement. Patient-specific 3D left renal vein (LRV) models were reconstructed from CTA data using MIMICS and 3-matic software. Hemodynamic simulations were performed via ANSYS (an engineering simulation software) to calculate SPG. Diagnostic performance of SPG and imaging parameters (e.g., beak sign, LRV diameter ratio) was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: SPG showed no significant difference from TPG (5.6±3.9 Conclusions: FEA-derived SPG correlates closely with invasive TPG, offering a reliable, non-invasive alternative for NCS diagnosis and postoperative monitoring. This approach enhances objectivity, reduces reliance on operator-dependent techniques, and may facilitate early intervention. Further refinement of FEA models and multicenter validation are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.