ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Artificial intelligence and elastography in diagnostic work-up of thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) characterizes thyroid nodules by automatically extracting features from ultrasound images, whereas elastography quantitatively assesses tissue stiffness to aid in discriminating between benign and malignant cases. This study systematically evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of combining AI with elastography in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodule. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) using a predefined "subject + keyword" strategy to locate diagnostic studies on the combined use of elastography and AI in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodule. Diagnostic test performance was evaluated by generating summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and calculating pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 17. Results: A total of 19 studies comprising 4,655 ultrasound images of thyroid nodule were included. Compared with available technologies, the combination of AI and elastography demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for thyroid diseases, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84-0.91], a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.94), a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 73.89 (95% CI: 40.49-134.85), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). Conclusions: AI combined with elastography has high diagnostic accuracy for thyroid nodule, and this promising technology is expected to be integrated into routine clinical practice to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of thyroid nodule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.