Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816038›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Prediction of tumor grade in endometrioid carcinoma using a deep learning radiomics model from ultrasound images: a multicenter study.

Xiaoling Liu, Weihan Xiao, Wenhao Li, Xiaomin Hu, Mengyao Xiao, Jing Qiao, Qi Luo, Fanding He, Xiang Gao, Weiwei Yin and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Xiaoling Liu *Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Weihan Xiao *Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wenhao Li *School of Computer and Software Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaomin HuDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Anzhen Nanchong Hospital of Capital Medical University & Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong, China.
Mengyao XiaoNorth Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Jing QiaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Qi LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Community Health Service Center of Qilizhan Street, Yaohai District, Hefei, China.
Fanding HeDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xiang GaoDepartment of Ultrasound, People's Hospital of Rizhao, Rizhao, China.
Weiwei YinDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second People's Hospital of Wuhu, Wuhu, China.
Jianfeng LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Anzhen Nanchong Hospital of Capital Medical University & Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong, China.
Hong LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Anzhen Nanchong Hospital of Capital Medical University & Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong, China.
Lin LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Suining Central Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Sihui DengDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.
Qinfeng WangDepartment of Ultrasound, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command of PLA, Chengdu, China.
Sijia ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Anzhen Nanchong Hospital of Capital Medical University & Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong, China.
Xiachuan QinDepartment of Ultrasound, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Chaoxue ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) tumor grade is a critical prognostic factor, but its accurate preoperative non-invasive assessment remains challenging due to the limitations of conventional imaging and biopsy. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) is the primary imaging modality but offers limited quantitative insights for grading. Deep learning radiomics (DLR), which combines the strengths of deep learning (DL) for automatic feature extraction and radiomics for quantifying tumor heterogeneity, holds promise for uncovering prognostic information from routine ultrasound images. This study aimed to develop and validate a DLR model based on preoperative TVUS images for the non-invasive differentiation of EEC tumor grades. Methods: A total of 297 EEC cases with confirmed histological grades, including grade 1 (G1), grade 2 (G2), and grade 3 (G3), were selected from 1,258 endometrial cancer patients who underwent hysterectomy across eight centers. Radiomics features were extracted from TVUS images, and a radiomics model was constructed using the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. Simultaneously, DL features were extracted using ResNet-50 to establish a DL model. A combined DLR model was then developed by integrating both feature sets, employing five-fold cross-validation for internal validation. An external testing cohort comprising 129 cases with corresponding grading data was collected from three independent centers. The performance of the three models in identifying EEC differentiation grade was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy. Results: In differentiating EEC grades, the DLR model outperformed both the single radiomics and DL models. In the identification of G3 and G1/G2, the AUC of the DLR model was 0.871 and 0.843 in the training cohort and the external testing cohort, respectively. The AUC of the identification of G2 and G1 was 0.856 and 0.816 in the training cohort and the external testing cohort, respectively. Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility of the DLR model. Conclusions: The DLR model based on TVUS images shows potential value for the non-invasive differentiation of EEC tumor grading and provides a useful supplement for non-invasive clinical staging of endometrial carcinoma prior to surgery.

Indexed as

deep learning radiomics (DLR)differentiationEndometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC)ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41816038
PMCPMC12971366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.