ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Bilateral suspended optic nerve within the sphenoid sinus: a rare case report of a critical anatomical variant.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The intimate and variable relationship between the optic nerve (ON) and the sphenoid sinus poses a significant risk of iatrogenic injury during endoscopic sinus surgery. A Type 3 ON, which courses directly through the sinus cavity, is uncommon; however, a nerve completely suspended and free from the lateral wall represents an exceptionally rare and high-risk anatomical variant. Case Presentation: A 23-year-old female presented with chronic otological symptoms. A non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan for cholesteatoma workup incidentally revealed extensive sphenoid sinus pneumatization. Crucially, both ONs were found to be coursing freely within the sinus cavities, completely separated from the lateral walls, with no associated ocular symptoms. Discussion: This bilateral presentation exemplifies the most extreme end of anatomical variability. Such a configuration drastically increases the risk of catastrophic visual loss during any sphenoid intervention, as standard landmarks are absent. The case underscores the critical importance of meticulous preoperative CT review to identify key risk indicators, such as anterior clinoid process pneumatization, and the radiologist's vital role in explicitly communicating these findings. It also highlights that these variations can be entirely asymptomatic and discovered incidentally. Conclusion: A free-lying ON within the sphenoid sinus is a critical surgical hazard. Prevention of iatrogenic injury is paramount and hinges upon detailed preoperative imaging analysis, heightened anatomical awareness, and disciplined surgical planning to avoid instrumentation in high-risk areas. This case serves as a potent reminder of these principles for ensuring patient safety in skull base surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.