ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
A collaborative multi-university virtual model for global health leadership education integrating educational technology: a mixed methods evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Challenges and constraints in global health practice such as inadequate international cooperation, cultural sensitivity, and interdisciplinary collaboration inform key gaps and opportunities to strengthen global health education, including technical skills and competencies needed for the next generation of global health leaders. We describe an innovative model of global health education leveraging advances in educational technology, co-developed and implemented by universities within the Association Pacific Rim Universities. The model was developed to address challenges and opportunities to strengthen global health education and has been implemented in two global health courses-one on leadership and one on ethics-for almost 10 years. The model was innovative in providing a virtual global learning environment in collaboration with multiple universities in diverse contexts, a novel approach back in 2015 and one that to this day is not widely available across universities. An evaluation of the model was conducted in 2025, and findings are reported. To evaluate the global health education model, we applied a mixed methods approach including surveys and discussion groups with students and faculty participating in the global health leadership course in the past 2 years. Approximately 83% of students (148/179) responded to the student survey and more than 80% of respondents reported high levels of mastery of course learning objectives and competencies, while 97% of students reported satisfaction with the course, with an emphasis on the model's benefits for developing and practicing global collaboration and communication. Faculty reported high satisfaction with the course's inclusion and modelling of a decolonized approach to global health education with the diversity of participating learners, guest speakers, and case studies and readings in the course. Developing and implementing effective global health education is critical for improving education and practice. Our intention in sharing this case study is to offer readers the opportunity to learn about and adapt this model in their own curricula and settings as desired as we collectively strive for improved global health education. The more such models are implemented across various topics and settings, the more we can achieve increased scalability and success in key components of global health training and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.