Trial reportFrontiers in public health2026
The effectiveness of a multidisciplinary collaborative intervention model on improving anxiety and depression in left-behind children and the study of its social support mechanisms.
Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary collaborative intervention in reducing anxiety and depression among left-behind children and to examine the mediating role of social support. Methods: This study conducted a randomized controlled trial in rural primary schools in Lianyungang City, China, involving 120 left-behind children (grades 4-6), randomly assigned to an intervention group and a control group (1:1). The control group received standard mental health education; the intervention group received a 12-week intervention program provided by a multidisciplinary team of professionals from developmental and educational psychology, applied psychology, social work, and clinical medicine. This program integrated psychological counseling, behavioral modification, family support, and community integration. Intervention effects were assessed using the SCARED, CDI, and PSSS scales at baseline, post-intervention, and at a 3-month follow-up. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA and structural equation modeling. Results: At baseline, the groups were comparable ( Conclusion: The multidisciplinary model effectively alleviates anxiety and depression in left-behind children primarily by strengthening multidimensional social support, demonstrating significant potential for large-scale implementation in public mental health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.