ArticleInternational journal of health, nutrition and exercise science2022
A comparison of Omega-3 Fatty Acids Intakes from Three Dietary Screening Tools.
Article in International journal of health, nutrition and exercise science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake, Anxiety, and Depression Among University Students in the UK: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Modulatory effects of dietary saturated fatty acids on platelet mitochondrial function following short-term exposure to ambient Particulate Matter (PMJournal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A · 2024Article
- Omega-3 fatty acids attenuate cardiovascular effects of short-term exposure to ambient air pollution.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: A newly developed omega-3 questionnaire (O3Q) designed to capture habitual intakes of omega-3 fatty acids was previously validated based on the whole blood levels of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and Omega-3 Index, but lacks comparison with existing "gold standard" dietary tools. Objective: To compare the estimated habitual intakes of omega-3 fatty acids from three dietary assessment tools including O3Q and two other commonly used methods (24-hour recall and Diet History Questionnaire). Methods: A correlational study of estimated omega-3 intakes from the O3Q, multiple 24-hour recalls, and Diet History Questionnaire collected from an observational study (n = 49) were compared to corresponding whole blood levels of EPA, DHA, and Omega-3 Index. The 49 participants included in this study completed the O3Q, Diet History Questionnaire, and at least one 24-hour recall during the observational study. Any incomplete data sets (missing one of the three kinds of dietary assessments) were excluded. Spearman's correlation evaluated the relationship between estimated omega-3 intake from each diet assessment method and biomarkers. Stepwise multiple linear regression examined associations of estimated dietary intakes of EPA+DHA from the three intake methods and the Omega-3 Index level. Results: The estimated intakes from the O3Q had higher correlation coefficients with the corresponding blood biomarkers (EPA, r Conclusions: The O3Q is the preferred tool to evaluate habitual Omega-3 fatty acids intake and estimate Omega-3 index and outperforms using multiple 24-hour recalls or the Diet History Questionnaire for these specific dietary variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41815941PMC12973117What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.