ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Efficacy and safety of guanxinshutong capsule as adjunctive therapy for unstable angina: an integrated systematic review, meta-analysis, and network pharmacology study.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Unstable angina (UA), characterized by worsening chest pain and increased risk of acute myocardial infarction or sudden death, is a major clinical condition necessitating urgent and effective intervention. Although guanxinshutong capsule (GXST) has demonstrated preliminary therapeutic potential in alleviating angina symptoms, it lacks sufficient and robust clinical evidence to confirm its efficacy and safety in UA treatment. Therefore, further clinical research is urgently needed to validate the practical value of GXST in managing UA. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of GXST as an adjunctive therapy for UA and to elucidate its potential pharmacological mechanisms. Methods: Relevant RCTs were included to investigate the effectiveness of GXST in combination with WM for UA. ROB 2 was applied to assess their methodological quality. The data integration, evidence quality assessment, and trial sequence analysis were performed using R software, the GRADE framework, and TSA software, respectively. Concurrently, the network pharmacology was employed to identify disease-relevant targets, active components, and core targets of GXST. Crucially, bioinformatics analysis was conducted to explore the potential regulatory mechanisms. Results: Fifteen RCTs were included. Compared with WM monotherapy, GXST combined with WM exhibited significantly superior efficacy across multiple indicators: clinical effective rate(RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.13-1.25), ECG effective rate (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.07-1.34), angina frequency (SMD = -2.20, 95% CI = -3.36 to -1.04), angina duration (SMD = -1.54, 95% CI = -2.14 to -0.94), PV levels(SMD = -0.82, 95% CI = -1.23 to -0.41), FIB levels(SMD = -1.18, 95% CI = -1.50 to -0.86), and TCM syndrome scores (SMD = -1.68, 95% CI = -2.18 to -1.18). However, no significant intergroup differences were detected in CK-MB, cTnI, or ARDI. KEGG enrichment analysis highlighted the PI3K-Akt and MAPK signaling pathways as central to the underlying mechanism. Molecular docking further demonstrated pronounced binding affinities of kaempferol, miltirone, and asiatic acid toward core targets AKT1, MAPK3, and PIK3CA, corroborating their therapeutic potential. Conclusion: The combination therapy of GXST and WM significantly boosted clinical efficacy in patients with UA. Its mechanism of action involves regulating the PIK3CA/AKT1 and MAPK3 signaling pathways. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025634213, PROSPERO CRD42025634213.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.