Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41815874›Full record

ArticleJSES international2026

Translation of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version.

Anna H Petersson, Jenny M Samuelsson, Hanna C Björnsson Hallgren, Johan H Scheer, Theresa M Holmgren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna H PeterssonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Jenny M SamuelssonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Hanna C Björnsson HallgrenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Johan H ScheerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Theresa M HolmgrenDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a widely used shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome measure. This study aimed to translate and adapt SPADI into Swedish, to evaluate psychometric properties and determine the minimal important change (MIC) in patients with subacromial pain. Methods: This study was conducted in 2 phases. Phase 1 involved translation and adaptation to Swedish using forward-backward translation and patients' feedback. In phase 2, 158 patients, with shoulder pain and disability due to subacromial pain, were recruited to evaluate validity, reliability, responsiveness and MIC. Results: There were no disagreements during the translation process, and patients found the questions relevant and comprehensible. The SPADI and 7-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores showed a high correlation (0,86). Internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha 0,93 (n = 158). Test-retest reliability with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient 0,87, (n = 60). The standard error of measurement was 3,8 and the minimal detectable change was 10,5 in the total score. Responsiveness had an area under the curve of 0,92 (95% confidence interval 0,9 to 1) generating a MIC of 11, with sensitivity at 92% and specificity at 75% (n = 107). Conclusion: The SPADI was successfully translated and adapted into Swedish and demonstrated excellent psychometric properties in patients with subacromial pain. Additionally, MIC values have been established to identify clinically meaningful changes, useful in both research and clinical practice. These findings support its use in this population, while further research should confirm validity for other shoulder conditions.

Indexed as

Minimal important changeOutcome assessmentPatient-reported outcome measuresReliabilityResponsivenessSubacromial painValidation study

Identifiers

PMID41815874
PMCPMC12972979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.