ArticleBio-protocol2026
Spatial Proteomics Using S4P.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating cell maps by deep learning integration of single-cell and spatially resolved transcriptomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatial proteomics enables the mapping of protein distribution within tissues, which is crucial for understanding cellular functions in their native context. While spatial transcriptomics has seen rapid advancement, spatial proteomics faces challenges due to protein non-amplifiability and mass spectrometry sensitivity limitations. This protocol describes a sparse sampling strategy for spatial proteomics (S4P) that combines multi-angle tissue strip microdissection with deep learning-based image reconstruction. The method achieves whole-tissue slice coverage with significantly reduced sampling requirements, enabling mapping of over 9,000 proteins in mouse brain tissue at 525 μm resolution within 200 h of mass spectrometry time. Key advantages include reduced sample processing time, deep proteome coverage, and applicability to centimeter-sized tissue samples. Key features • Achieves whole-tissue slice coverage for spatial proteomics mapping. • Enables reconstruction of spatial protein distribution using sparse sampling with multi-angle strip projections. • Combines mass spectrometry-based proteomics with deep learning-based image reconstruction. • Reduces required mass spectrometry time by 50%-90% compared to gridding-based approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.