ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Posterior interosseous artery perforator propeller flap for the repair of wrist and hand dorsal wounds.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the posterior interosseous artery (PIA) perforator propeller flap for the repair of dorsal wrist and hand wounds. Methods: From October 2018 to October 2022, 12 patients with dorsal defects of the wrist ( Results: Twelve cases of skin flaps were successfully harvested, and the donor sites were directly sutured. Postoperatively, 11 flaps survived completely, while one case developed a wound infection that resolved with debridement and dressing changes. Patients were followed for 6-18 months (mean 12 months). Flap texture and appearance were satisfactory, with no significant swelling observed. Patient satisfaction reached 91.67%. At the final follow-up, DASH scores ranged from 2 to 15, with a mean of 9.2. Mild scar hyperplasia was observed at the donor site in two cases and at the flap margin in one case. Conclusion: For repairing soft tissue defects of the dorsal wrist, the posterior interosseous artery perforator flap provides a valuable and reliable clinical option due to its consistent vascular supply, preservation of major vessels, minimal surgical complexity, favorable aesthetic and tactile qualities, minimal donor-site trauma, and high flap survival rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.