ArticleJCPP advances2026
School experiences and self-harm in the OxWell study.
Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Schools are key for identifying challenges faced by young people who self-harm (SH). Understanding how school factors influence SH predictors is essential for developing effective school-based interventions. We aimed to conduct a secondary data analysis using the OxWell Student Survey to identify associations between young people's school experiences and SH. Methods: Using cross-sectional data from English secondary schools in the 2023 OxWell Student Survey, we conducted multi-level logistic regressions to analyse whether SH was associated with student age, gender, mental health (RCADS) and wellbeing (sWEMWBS). School experience measures included enjoyment, bullying, racism, extracurricular activities, school worry, and adults listening. Results: Individual students' perception that the school did not deal well with bullying were associated with a 38% increase in SH (OR = 1.38; CI 1.20-1.59) and schools not dealing well with racism was associated with a 20% increase in the likelihood of SH (OR = 1.20; CI 1.04-1.38). Similarly, the likelihood of SH was 30% higher in schools with students feeling unfairly picked on by their teacher (OR = 1.30; CI 1.14-1.47). Greater SH was associated with being female (OR = 1.15; CI 0.99-1.32), gender diverse (OR = 3.49; CI 2.38-5.12), or preferring not to say (OR = 2.02; CI 1.44-2.83) compared to males. Lower wellbeing scores (OR = 0.93; CI 0.93-0.95) and higher RCADS scores (OR = 1.12; CI 1.11-1.13) were also linked to higher SH likelihood. Conclusion: Interventions that address bullying, racism, teacher-pupil relationships as well as providing specific support for more vulnerable groups such as females and gender diverse young people are important components of public mental health interventions that might reduce levels of SH. Future research should explore these relationships longitudinally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.