Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41815751›Full record

ReviewHealth affairs scholar2026

Inclusion of antimicrobial resistance in a pandemic agreement: why it matters and what comes next?

Jesic Beckham, Rishabh Jain, Delaram Haghgozar, Enrique Castro-Sanchez, Jyoti Joshi, Mirfin Mpundu, Rifat Atun, Raheelah Ahmad, SEDRIC (Surveillance and Epidemiology of Drug-Resistant Infections Consortium) Board

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jesic BeckhamDepartment of Global, Public and Population Health and Policy, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St Georges, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9472-0511
Rishabh JainDepartment of Global, Public and Population Health and Policy, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St Georges, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7150-8819
Delaram HaghgozarDepartment of Global, Public and Population Health and Policy, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St Georges, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom.
Enrique Castro-SanchezDepartment of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-9496
Jyoti JoshiInternational Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions, Copenhagen 2300 S, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0971-7257
Mirfin MpunduReAct Africa, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-0995
Rifat AtunDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1531-5983
Raheelah AhmadDepartment of Global, Public and Population Health and Policy, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St Georges, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4294-7142
SEDRIC (Surveillance and Epidemiology of Drug-Resistant Infections Consortium) Board

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), referred to as the "constant pandemic," exceeds malaria and HIV as a cause of mortality across low- and middle-income countries. As AMR has been included in the recently adopted world's first pandemic agreement, we assessed the implications going forward for addressing AMR and meeting the UN General Assembly AMR targets. Methods: A rapid literature review was conducted to synthesize policy perspectives and empirical literature using 3 databases (PubMed, Embase, and CABI-Global Health) for studies published from December 2021 to May 2025. Results: Of the 56 included studies, only 2 were empirical research. Inductive and deductive analyses using the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development framework with a force-field analysis were used to identify drivers and factors that may impede AMR reduction via the pandemic agreement. Challenges include inequity, inadequate governance, and financing. Factors that may impede implementation of the agreement currently outweigh driving forces. Conclusion: While AMR is included in the pandemic agreement, assessing the merits and risks associated with doing so is important to inform the detail and implementation strategy of the agreement itself. There is consensus that strengthening governance frameworks, fostering equity, and ensuring fair access to health resources are imperative.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancehealth equityinternational health regulationspandemic accordpandemic agreementpandemic instrumentpandemic treaty

Identifiers

PMID41815751
PMCPMC12975186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.