ReviewHealth affairs scholar2026
Inclusion of antimicrobial resistance in a pandemic agreement: why it matters and what comes next?
Review in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ten high-priority areas for health policy research in 2026-2027.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), referred to as the "constant pandemic," exceeds malaria and HIV as a cause of mortality across low- and middle-income countries. As AMR has been included in the recently adopted world's first pandemic agreement, we assessed the implications going forward for addressing AMR and meeting the UN General Assembly AMR targets. Methods: A rapid literature review was conducted to synthesize policy perspectives and empirical literature using 3 databases (PubMed, Embase, and CABI-Global Health) for studies published from December 2021 to May 2025. Results: Of the 56 included studies, only 2 were empirical research. Inductive and deductive analyses using the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development framework with a force-field analysis were used to identify drivers and factors that may impede AMR reduction via the pandemic agreement. Challenges include inequity, inadequate governance, and financing. Factors that may impede implementation of the agreement currently outweigh driving forces. Conclusion: While AMR is included in the pandemic agreement, assessing the merits and risks associated with doing so is important to inform the detail and implementation strategy of the agreement itself. There is consensus that strengthening governance frameworks, fostering equity, and ensuring fair access to health resources are imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.