Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41815750›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Declining use of percutaneous coronary intervention across population groups, 2011-2022.

Vadim M Shteyler, Jeffrey Tabas, Jessica N Holtzman, Yu-Chu Shen, Renee Y Hsia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vadim M ShteylerDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Jeffrey TabasDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4837-1540
Jessica N HoltzmanDivision of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1721-1512
Yu-Chu ShenDepartment of Defense Management, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-0345
Renee Y HsiaPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.

Funding

The Impact of Cardiac Care Regionalization on Access, Treatment, and OutcomesR01HL134182 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Renee Yuen-Jan Hsia, YU-CHU SHEN · 2016 to 2026
$4.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL134182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary revascularization rates declined with decreasing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and evolving appropriate use criteria (AUC). Population-based utilization trends by sociodemographic categories have not been assessed. Methods: We examined annual trends of all cardiac catheterizations and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in California, 2011-2022, using the Health Care Access and Information database. We compared the PCI shares of cardiac catheterizations ("PCI shares") between sociodemographic and facility-type strata. Regression models assessed significance of linear trends; pairwise comparisons assessed differences between strata. Results: We identified 1 839 444 cardiac catheterizations between 2011 and 2022. Catheterizations and PCI decreased from 2011 to 2013, plateaued, then decreased again in 2020. Higher median zip code family income, private insurance, and White or Asian/Pacific Islander, compared to Black or Hispanic, race were associated with higher PCI shares. Conclusions: Califoirnia's PCI share decreased, likely with decreasing ACS and AUC for coronary revascularization. Decreasing PCI but not cardiac catheterizations suggests that the contributors to fewer interventional procedures did not affect diagnostic procedure rates. Sociodemographic and payer differences in the PCI share persisted throughout the study, despite Medicaid expansion. The PCI share of cardiac catheterizations may be a useful measure of utilization heterogeneity across sociodemographic strata.

Indexed as

cardiac catheterizationcardiologyhealth servicespercutaneous coronary interventionsocioeconomic statusutilization by race

Identifiers

PMID41815750
PMCPMC12974569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.