ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Incidental Discovery of Conjunctival
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Case Presentation: The parasite was identified intraoperatively in a 74-year-old female with a long-standing history of diabetes who was undergoing surgery for diabetic tractional retinal detachment in her right eye. She reported poor hygiene habits but no direct pet contact. The parasite, found within the conjunctival sac, was excised and confirmed by pathological examination. Postoperative care included antibiotic eye drops. At the 3-month follow-up, her best corrected visual acuity had improved to 6/120 with no recurrence. Conclusion: This case emphasizes the critical role of comprehensive preoperative examination for the timely detection of ocular parasites to prevent complications. It also highlights the need for clinician awareness of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.