Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41815657›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026

Duplex Ultrasound Differentiation of Popliteal Artery Spasm Versus True Arterial Injury During Knee Surgery: A Case Report.

Aidan A Jagasia, Andrew B Barcenas, Ashley Hsu, Allison Ariniello, George F Rick Hatch Iii

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aidan A JagasiaDepartment of Medical Education, Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, Illinois.
Andrew B BarcenasDepartment of Medical Education, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.
Ashley HsuDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Allison ArinielloDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
George F Rick Hatch IiiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vascular compromise during knee surgery is rare but can lead to serious limb-threatening consequences if not identified and managed promptly. Surgeons must rapidly determine whether loss of distal pulses represents reversible compromise, such as compression or spasm, or a true arterial injury requiring urgent repair. Duplex ultrasound provides real-time visualization of arterial anatomy and blood flow patterns, yet its use during orthopedic procedures has been described infrequently. This report presents two intraoperative vascular events during knee surgery that initially appeared similar but required very different management strategies. To our knowledge, this side-by-side comparison emphasizes an uncommon but critical diagnostic role for duplex ultrasound in orthopedic practice. Case Report: The first patient was a 37-year-old man who developed a sudden loss of distal pulses during arthroscopic surgery for severe knee arthrofibrosis after prior ligament reconstruction. Duplex ultrasound showed preserved pulsatile flow in the popliteal artery despite absent signals distally. Further evaluation revealed an expanding hematoma near the posteromedial portal. After hematoma evacuation, distal pulses returned and the patient recovered without vascular intervention.The second patient was a 56-year-old man undergoing corrective osteotomy for longstanding knee instability. He experienced an abrupt loss of distal pulses accompanied by brisk bleeding during wound closure. Duplex ultrasound demonstrated the absence of flow in the popliteal artery. Surgical exploration revealed an intraluminal thrombus and a partial anterior wall laceration of the popliteal artery. Thrombectomy and primary repair restored distal perfusion, and the patient recovered uneventfully after vascular repair. Conclusion: These two cases highlight the importance of distinguishing reversible vascular compromise from true arterial injury during knee surgery. Duplex ultrasound offered a rapid, non-invasive assessment of arterial patency and waveform patterns that helped guide decision-making when distal signals were lost. Incorporating duplex evaluation into the intraoperative workflow may reduce unnecessary exploration, ensure timely vascular consultation, and improve surgical safety. This comparison demonstrates an important and underreported diagnostic application of duplex ultrasound in orthopedic surgery and reinforces its potential value for surgeons managing complex posterior knee exposures or osteotomy procedures.

Indexed as

duplex ultrasoundPopliteal arteryvascular injury

Identifiers

PMID41815657
PMCPMC12973061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.