ArticleCureus2026
An Interpretable Chest X-ray Classification Framework Using Prototype Memory and Counterfactual Consistency.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation requires recognition of subtle and heterogenous radiographic patterns, yet conventional deep learning models often rely on spurious image cues that lack anatomical or pathological relevance. This study presents CXR-NeXus, an interpretable chest X-ray classification framework designed to promote explicit visual reasoning and reliable decision behavior under weak supervision. The proposed method integrates prototype memory with counterfactual consistency to constrain model predictions to clinically meaningful pulmonary evidence. CXR-NeXus learns multiple class-specific prototypes that represent diverse radiographic phenotypes for COVID-19, pneumonia, tuberculosis, and normal cases. Each prediction is supported by similarity to representative prototype patterns, enabling transparent "this-looks-like-that" explanations at the image level. To further ensure causal dependence on pathological evidence, counterfactual chest X-rays are generated by Grad-CAM-guided lesion suppression constrained within coarse lung regions. The model is explicitly trained to reduce disease confidence when lesion evidence is removed, aligning prediction behavior with clinical intuition. In addition, an evidence-alignment regularization is introduced to penalize extra-pulmonary saliency and to localize attention changes induced by counterfactual perturbations. The overall learning objective jointly optimizes classification performance, margin-based prototype separation, counterfactual consistency, and anatomically plausible attention, without requiring pixel-level lesion annotations. Experiments on a four-class chest X-ray dataset demonstrate that the proposed framework improves macro-average F1 score, Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC), specificity, and probability calibration compared with strong baselines, while substantially reducing reliance on spurious visual cues. These results suggest that combining prototype-level semantic anchoring with counterfactual-driven visual reasoning provides a practical and interpretable solution for reliable chest X-ray analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.