Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41815609›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Prevalence of Fusion Between Adjacent Thoracic Spinous Processes in Adult Cadavers.

Priyanka N Sharma, Kinjal Jethva, Hetal Vaishnani, Meghana Joshi, Priyanka Gohil, Manoj M Kulkarni, Achleshwar R Gandotra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Priyanka N SharmaAnatomy, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, IND.
Kinjal JethvaAnatomy, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, IND.
Hetal VaishnaniAnatomy, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, IND.
Meghana JoshiAnatomy, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, IND.
Priyanka GohilAnatomy, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, IND.
Manoj M KulkarniAnatomy, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, IND.
Achleshwar R GandotraAnatomy, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThoracic vertebrae play a crucial role in spinal stability and the protection of the spinal cord. Thoracic spinous process fusion, whether congenital or acquired, can affect spinal biomechanics and complicate surgical procedures. Thoracic spinous process fusion is an anatomical variation with potential clinical significance; however, its prevalence and distribution remain underreported. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and vertebral-level distribution of thoracic spinous process fusion in adult cadavers.

methodsA cross-sectional observational cadaveric study was conducted on 30 formalin-fixed adult cadavers (15 males, 15 females) aged 60-95 years. After dissection and removal of soft tissues, the thoracic spinous processes from T1 to T12 were examined for osseous fusion between the adjacent vertebrae. Fusion was defined as complete bony continuity without interspinous gaps or fibrous tissues. The presence of fusion and vertebral levels was documented. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used for the analyses.

resultsThoracic spinous process fusion was observed in five of 30 thoracic spine specimens (360 thoracic vertebrae) (16.7%), with two men (6.7%) and three women (10.0%) affected. Fusion occurred at the T3-T4, T6-T7, T9-T12, and T11-T12 levels, with T11-T12 showing the highest frequency (6.7%). No statistically significant sex differences were found (p=1). All fused spinous processes demonstrated complete bony continuity without the presence of fibrous tissue.

conclusionThoracic spinous process fusion is a notable anatomical variation, with a prevalence of 16.7% in the adult cadaveric sample. Awareness of its prevalence and localization can assist surgeons in preoperative planning and intraoperative level identification, thereby reducing surgical errors and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

scoliosisspinous process fusionthoracic spinethoracic vertebraevertebral synostosiswrong-level spine surgery

Identifiers

PMID41815609
PMCPMC12973909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.