ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Optimal nasotracheal tube insertion depth in neonates.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Existing recommendations for nasotracheal endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion depth in neonates have shown remarkable consistency over decades and have recently been prospectively evaluated in clinical practice. However, large prospective datasets systematically validating biometric predictors and quantifying expected variability remain limited. This study aimed to confirm established nasotracheal ETT depth recommendations using a large prospective cohort and to translate these findings into a standardized, evidence-based bedside reference. Methods: We analyzed 497 nasotracheal intubations performed between 2017 and 2023 in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. Tube position was prospectively assessed after each intubation using standardized chest radiography. Optimal ETT placement was defined as the tube tip located between the clavicles and at least 1 cm above the tracheal carina. Clinical and biometric parameters were systematically recorded, and their associations with insertion depth were evaluated using LOESS curves and linear regression models. Results: Across a wide range of gestational ages and body weights, body weight at the time of intubation showed the strongest and most consistent association with optimal nasotracheal ETT insertion depth (adjusted R Conclusion: In this large prospective cohort, body weight at the time of intubation was confirmed as the most reliable single predictor of optimal nasotracheal endotracheal tube insertion depth in neonates. Our findings support established reference ranges and provide quantitative confirmation across a broad spectrum of gestational ages and body weights. By translating these data into a concise, evidence-based bedside chart and a complementary digital reference, this study strengthens confidence in existing recommendations and supports standardized clinical practice, while emphasizing the need for clinical judgement and post-intubation verification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.