ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2026
Complications of catheter-directed interventions in acute pulmonary embolism: a narrative expert review with guidance on management.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Catheter-directed interventions (CDI) for pulmonary embolism (PE) have emerged as alternatives to systemic thrombolysis for patients requiring reperfusion, enabling thrombus burden reduction through low-dose local thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. Despite encouraging hemodynamic and clinical outcomes, procedure-specific complications are poorly characterized in the literature. This narrative review aims to synthesize the reported complications of CDI in acute PE and provide practical management strategies. Methods: A PubMed search covering 2014-2025, limited to articles published in English or Spanish, complemented by reference screening, identified randomized clinical trials and prospective or retrospective registries of CDI in acute PE reporting safety outcomes. These studies were used to construct a comprehensive overview of CDI-related complications, while additional registries, case reports, and case series were examined to describe rare events not captured by primary studies, as well as expert insights when evidence was insufficient or unavailable. Key Content and Findings: Complications of CDI in acute PE encompass a broad and heterogeneous spectrum including access-site complications, right-heart injury, pulmonary arterial lesions, catheter malfunction and mechanical complications, and hemodynamic deterioration. Their incidence varies considerably across studies, and the absence of standardized definitions or classifications limits accurate assessment of the true frequency and clinical impact of those adverse events. Conclusions: Based on the available evidence, this narrative expert review examines the spectrum of CDI-related complications in acute PE. It seeks to bridge the gap between innovation and safety by equipping clinicians and interventionalists with practical guidance for the recognition, prevention, and management of these adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.