ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
UNITe: exploiting conserved links between oncogenesis and homeostasis to identify novel cancer drivers.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Similarities between oncogenesis and several homeostatic processes (HPs)-wound healing, regeneration, and cellular stress response-have long been recognized. However, the molecular underpinning of these similarities is not fully understood. While several molecular aspects of HPs are evolutionarily conserved, different species exhibit substantial variation in the genes involved in these HPs, as well as in their predisposition to cancer. Methods: We leveraged 75 published (with 321 experiments across 14 species) experimental datasets of genes implicated in HPs across multiple species from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), pan-cancer (32 cancer types) multi-omics datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and several benchmarking datasets from public repositories [such as Genotype Tissue Expression (GTEx), MSigDB, COSMIC, and the Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap)], as well as literature to comprehensively investigate links between conserved aspects of HPs and human cancers. We performed several analyses to understand broad mechanistic links between cancer and the homeostatic processes. Results: We compiled high-confidence conserved consensus gene sets for stress response (SR), wound healing (WH), and regeneration (RG)-jointly as HPs for "homeostatic processes". We found that broadly across cancers, the HP genes exhibit elevated mutations, including copy number aberrations and differential gene expression in the tumor compared to healthy tissue, and are associated with patient survival. In the human protein interaction network, HP genes cluster by the process type as well as with the known cancer driver genes. Leveraging this observation, here, we presented a tool, UNITe (Uncovering Network-based Interactions between Homeostatic processes and Tumorigenesis), which predicts cancer drivers based solely on network proximity to HP genes, with an area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.81, far better than several current approaches, and across multiple benchmark datasets. Applying UNITe genome-wide, we reported several novel potential cancer drivers and validated them using multiple lines of evidence. Conclusions: Overall, we presented a first comparative analysis of cancer drivers with conserved homeostatic processes, suggesting a complementary approach to prioritizing cancer drivers. The model and the codes are freely available for public usage at https://github.com/hannenhalli-lab/conserved_links_homeostasis_oncogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.