ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Chidamide combined with decitabine, venetoclax, and low-dose cytarabine for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a single-center case series.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) carries a poor prognosis. We report three patients with R/R AML, each of whom had relapsed after at least two prior chemotherapy regimens or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), treated with chidamide, decitabine, venetoclax, and low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) (CHI-DEC-VEN-LDAC). After a single treatment cycle, all three patients achieved complete remission (CR), and two attained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Adverse events were manageable, primarily consisting of cytopenias and infections, with no treatment-related deaths. These results suggest that the therapy is effective and well-tolerated, particularly in patients with R/R AML who have had extensive prior treatment. The regimen shows promise as a potential bridging or debulking strategy, but further research with larger cohorts and longer follow-up is needed to confirm its long-term efficacy. These cases highlight the potential benefits of chemotherapy-free or low-chemotherapy approaches for R/R AML treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.