ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
A penile ring entrapment: a rare case report and review of management options.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Penile ring entrapment is a rare urological emergency requiring prompt management otherwise it gets complicated and results in penile amputation and death. We present the management of a case of an entrapped penile ring in a psychiatric patient with penile skin loss in a resource-limited setup treated by a multidisciplinary team. Case presentation: A 28-year-old male psychiatric patient presented after 72 hours of a penile ring insertion for a delusional belief of obeying his father's command with associated painful penile swelling, skin blistering, and acute urinary retention. The ring was cut using a manual ring cutter and K-wire, with full penile recovery on wound care followed by grafting in 6 months of follow-up. Discussion: A penile ring typically results in the constriction of the penile tissue with subsequent vascular compromise and development of complications. The principles of management of penile ring entrapment involves treating the underlying reason for penile ring application, removal of the ring, and managing complications. The options of removing the ring include sliding, cutting, and penile surgical interventions. The choice which option to use depends on the size of the constricting object, incarceration time, injury level, available instruments, and experience of expertise. Conclusion: Eroticism, erectile dysfunctions, and underlying untreated psychiatric disorders are the most common reasons for penile ring insertion. Delayed ring removal due to embarrassment, psychiatric disorder, and multiple self-trials of ring removal at home can result in the development of complications. Prompt ring removal requires standard gadgets, a multidisciplinary approach, and local management protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.