Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41815483›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026

A penile ring entrapment: a rare case report and review of management options.

Mensur M Ahmed, Getachew A Zerihun, Dagimawi A Teferi, Mintesnot T Berta, Alemu B Hirpo, Mintesnot Y Kidane

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mensur M AhmedUrology Division, Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7147-8465
Getachew A ZerihunUrology Division, Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dagimawi A TeferiUrology Division, Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9427-2580
Mintesnot T BertaUrology Division, Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Alemu B HirpoUrology Division, Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4474-2825
Mintesnot Y KidaneUrology Division, Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3252-0257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Penile ring entrapment is a rare urological emergency requiring prompt management otherwise it gets complicated and results in penile amputation and death. We present the management of a case of an entrapped penile ring in a psychiatric patient with penile skin loss in a resource-limited setup treated by a multidisciplinary team. Case presentation: A 28-year-old male psychiatric patient presented after 72 hours of a penile ring insertion for a delusional belief of obeying his father's command with associated painful penile swelling, skin blistering, and acute urinary retention. The ring was cut using a manual ring cutter and K-wire, with full penile recovery on wound care followed by grafting in 6 months of follow-up. Discussion: A penile ring typically results in the constriction of the penile tissue with subsequent vascular compromise and development of complications. The principles of management of penile ring entrapment involves treating the underlying reason for penile ring application, removal of the ring, and managing complications. The options of removing the ring include sliding, cutting, and penile surgical interventions. The choice which option to use depends on the size of the constricting object, incarceration time, injury level, available instruments, and experience of expertise. Conclusion: Eroticism, erectile dysfunctions, and underlying untreated psychiatric disorders are the most common reasons for penile ring insertion. Delayed ring removal due to embarrassment, psychiatric disorder, and multiple self-trials of ring removal at home can result in the development of complications. Prompt ring removal requires standard gadgets, a multidisciplinary approach, and local management protocols.

Indexed as

case reportpenile injurypenile strangulationPREring entrapmentskin graft

Identifiers

PMID41815483
PMCPMC12974356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.