ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Difficult to treat purulent pericarditis - where does full sternotomy stand? A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Purulent pericarditis is a subtype of acute pericarditis with a high mortality even when adequately treated. Standard therapy is a combination of antibiotics and drainage, which can be more or less invasive. This is a case report of a patient with purulent pericarditis where cardiac surgery via sternotomy for thorough debridement and lavage was required for complete infection control. Case presentation: A 41-year-old man with a history of injected and inhaled drug use was admitted with a large pericardial effusion, and 700 mL of pus was percutaneously drained. After being started on broad spectrum antibiotics the patient remained with persistent signs of infection, and was submitted to surgical drainage and debridement via full median sternotomy. The patient improved progressively afterwards, and after agent identification and being started on intravenous penicillin, he was discharged after 4 weeks, without evidence of wound infection. Clinical Discussion: An organized pleural effusion was likely the cause of the purulent pericarditis. Of all invasive treatment options available, full median sternotomy was considered the most appropriate for this patient, as it allowed for maximal exposure for debridement. Even though the patient was operated in an actively infected state, there was no wound infection or dehiscence, in part because of meticulous perioperative wound care. Conclusion: Purulent pericarditis is a fatal disease, and cardiac surgery via full median sternotomy may be necessary and at times the most appropriate for adequate complete treatment, as it is simple, easily reproducible, and with an acceptable risk of wound infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.