Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41815460›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026

Uterine didelphys presenting as pelvic organ prolapse and second trimester uterine rupture: a case series and literature review.

Musie Negasi Gebreslase, Birhanu Kassie Reta, Tesfay Abadi Gebrekirstose, Haftom Guesh Girmay, Dori Woldu, Seyoum Berihun Derbew

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Musie Negasi GebreslaseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aksum University College of Health Science, Aksum, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3808-7750
Birhanu Kassie RetaDepartment of Pathology, Aksum University College of Health Science, Aksum, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1897-9072
Tesfay Abadi GebrekirstoseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aksum University College of Health Science, Aksum, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8137-0040
Haftom Guesh GirmayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aksum University College of Health Science, Aksum, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4988-2282
Dori WolduDepartment of Radiology, Aksum University College of Health Science, Aksum, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4982-5702
Seyoum Berihun DerbewDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Aksum University College of Health Science, Aksum, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6569-1177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Uterine didelphys is a very rare Mullerian duct anomaly resulting from complete failure of ductal fusion, leading to duplication of uterine horns, cervix, and sometimes the proximal vagina. Although many of them are asymptomatic, it can present as poor reproductive outcomes or, rarely, pelvic organ prolapse. Reports of obstetric rupture in early gestation or prolapse in a didelphic uterus are exceedingly rare. Case presentation: We present two contrasting cases that present differently in a didelphys uterus. First, a 26-year-old primigravida initially had an unexplained massive hemoperitoneum at 17 weeks of gestation. One uterine horn of a didelphys uterus ruptured during an emergency laparotomy, resulting in expulsion of the fetus and the placenta into the peritoneal cavity. This required a supracervical hysterectomy of the ruptured horn. The second case describes a 50-year-old postmenopausal woman with a 5-year history of vaginal mass and urinary symptoms. She was preoperatively diagnosed with third-degree uterovaginal prolapse and underwent transvaginal hysterectomy, during which a didelphic uterus was unexpectedly identified. Both patients recovered uneventfully after surgery. Clinical discussion: These cases illustrate the diagnostic and intraoperative challenges of uterine didelphys. In the obstetric case, the anomaly was identified solely post-rupture, whereas in the gynecologic case, it was detected incidentally during prolapse surgery. Conclusion: Uterine didelphys can present across a wide spectrum - from life-threatening rupture to chronic prolapse. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion in atypical presentations and be prepared for unexpected anatomy to ensure safe, individualized management.

Indexed as

case reportMullerian anomaliespelvic organ prolapseuterine ruptureuterus didelphys

Identifiers

PMID41815460
PMCPMC12974349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.