SynthesisFrontiers in ophthalmology2026
Imaging and functional correlates of fibrosis in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy being the standard of care for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), long-term visual decline remains common, with subretinal fibrosis representing a major cause of irreversible vision loss. Objective: To systematically evaluate how imaging-defined fibrosis in nAMD is defined and quantified, its incidence under anti-VEGF therapy, associated baseline associations, and its impact on visual outcomes. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus through September 2025 for studies reporting imaging-defined fibrosis in anti-VEGF-treated nAMD. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trial secondary analyses, prospective and retrospective cohorts, and registries. Two reviewers independently extracted data on fibrosis definitions, imaging modalities, associations, and functional outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) difference (ETDRS letters) and the odds ratio for incident fibrosis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Results: Fifty-eight studies were included (12 randomized trial secondary analyses, 18 prospective studies, and 28 retrospective studies). Across studies, subretinal fibrosis developed in approximately 10-15% of eyes within 2 years and 40-50% by 5 years of anti-VEGF therapy, with a lower incidence under fixed or treat-and-extend regimens compared with pro re nata dosing. Eyes with fibrosis had consistently worse visual outcomes (pooled BCVA difference -29 ETDRS letters; 95% CI -47 to -12). Key associations included type 2 macular neovascularisation (OR 5.7), subretinal hyperreflective material (OR 2.7), intraretinal fluid (OR 3.6), and large haemorrhage (OR 2.3), while subretinal fluid appeared protective (OR 0.6). Definitions and quantification approaches varied widely across imaging modalities. Conclusions: Fibrosis remains a frequent and vision-limiting sequela of treated nAMD, with substantial heterogeneity in imaging definitions and grading methods limiting cross-study comparability. Standardised OCT-anchored definitions, reproducible quantitative measures, and functional endpoints beyond BCVA are needed to advance anti-fibrotic therapeutic development and improve long-term visual outcomes. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420231132016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.