ArticleAsian journal of urology2026
The modified Devine procedure for penile reconstruction: A retrospective study of 80 cases.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Concealed penis is a common congenital genital abnormality. This study aimed to introduce a penile reconstruction method for concealed penis, namely the modified Devine procedure, and evaluate its safety and efficacy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 80 consecutive patients with concealed penis, who underwent surgical correction between May 2019 and May 2023 in our department. All patients underwent a modified Devine procedure. Data on the patients' age, body mass index, operative time, blood loss, preoperative and postoperative penile lengths, and postoperative complications were collected and analyzed. Results: All operations were successful. Patients had a mean age of 10.30 (standard deviation [SD] 1.07) years and a mean body mass index of 20.26 (SD 2.26) kg/m Conclusion: The modified Devine procedure for concealed penis achieved clinically safe and effective penile reconstruction outcomes, as well as satisfactory cosmetic appearance. Given its favorable results and minimal complications, this surgical approach appears to be a promising surgical option for selected patients with concealed penis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.