ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Carotid Artery Stenting Outcomes in Comprehensive Stroke Hospitals (CASSH): A Prospective Multicenter Study.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe CASONI study (Carotid Artery Stenting Outcomes by Neurointerventional Surgeons) showed that proceduralist experience significantly reduces complications in carotid artery stenting. The CASSH study (Carotid Artery Stenting Outcomes in Comprehensive Stroke Hospitals) prospectively evaluates real-world carotid artery stenting outcomes by fellowship-trained neurointerventionalists at comprehensive stroke centers across the United States to validate and expand on CASONI's findings.
methodsCASSH is a multicenter, prospective observational study conducted across 15 US comprehensive stroke centers from January 2023 to December 2024. Adults with symptomatic ≥50% or asymptomatic ≥70% carotid stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting by fellowship-trained neurointerventionalists were included. The primary outcome was a 30-day composite of procedure-related death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes included nonprocedural mortality, access site complications, stent thrombosis, and other adverse events. Logistic regression identified predictors of adverse outcomes.
resultsAmong 889 patients (mean age 70.3±9.9 years; 61.4% male), 87.1% had hypertension and 63.1% were symptomatic. The 30-day composite primary outcome occurred in 1.2% (mortality 0.8%, ischemic stroke 0.3%, hemorrhagic stroke 0.2%, myocardial infarction 0.2%). Composite secondary outcome occurred in 5.4%, most commonly access site complications (1.7%) and nonprocedural mortality (1.5%). Higher preprocedural modified Rankin Scale (odds ratio [OR], 1.42), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (OR, 1.09), and longer fluoroscopy times (OR, 1.02) were associated with increased complication risk. Mortality was independently predicted by elevated modified Rankin Scale (OR, 1.72), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (OR, 1.15), older age (OR, 1.05 per year), and lower ejection fraction (OR, 0.96). Postprocedural antiplatelet therapy was protective, reducing both complications (OR, 0.03) and mortality (OR, 0.07).
conclusionsCarotid artery stenting performed by fellowship-trained neurointerventionalists at comprehensive stroke centers is associated with low rates of periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, and death. These outcomes align with the landmark CREST-2 trial (Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial), particularly in asymptomatic patients, and are strongly influenced by preprocedural disability, stroke severity, age, and cardiac function, underscoring the importance of patient selection and optimized perioperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.