In one paragraphArticle in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
36 authors.
Lucia Antunes ChagasDepartment of Radiology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3828-6369 Vanessa Freitas BrattiDepartments of Oncology and Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3287-8312 Adriano TachibanaDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2282-2892 Almir Galvão Vieira BitencourtDepartment of Radiology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0192-9885 Bernardo Peres SalvajoliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5093-2290 Douglas Jorge RacyDepartment of Radiology, Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5089-9953 Fernando Morbeck CoelhoDepartment of Radiology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6704-4417 Giuseppe D'IppolitoDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8902-5017 Graziela Campos OliveiraDepartment of Radiology, Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3853-6076 Jose de Arimateia Araujo-FilhoDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8627-3661 Leandro Machado ColliDepartment of Oncology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6928-1195 Luis Filipe de Souza GodoyDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6918-6865 Marcelo Araujo QueirozDepartment of Radiology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0052-0682 Márcio Valente Yamada SawamuraDepartment of Radiology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9424-9776 Maria Clara FernandesDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-333X Marisa Riscalla MadiDepartment of Radiology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1049-4932 Maria Ignez BraghiroliDepartment of Oncology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6366-8786 Richard Kinh Gian DoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6554-0310 Rodrigo Sampaio ChiarantanoDepartment of Radiology, Hospital do Cancer de Barretos, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5932-0768 Rodrigo Pamplona PolizioDepartment of Radiology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2443-4447 Ulysses Ribeiro JuniorDepartment of Gastroenterology and Nutrology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1711-7347 Valdair Francisco MugliaDepartment of Radiology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4700-0599 Paulo Marcelo Gehm HoffDepartment of Oncology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0065-2194 Carlos Alberto BuchpiguelDepartment of Radiology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0956-2790 Giovanni Guido CerriDepartment of Radiology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6707-8721 Cesar Higa NomuraDepartment of Radiology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7131-6614 Funding
X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4MNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Objective: The Laudo Estruturado e Léxico em Oncologia (LELEX, Lexicon and Structured Reporting in Oncology) initiative was established to develop a standardized lexicon and structured reporting system applicable across cancer types. Methods: The São Paulo Radiology Society and Brazilian Society of Medical Oncology assembled a 27-member multidisciplinary consensus panel that included radiologists, medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons, and a patient representative. A literature review identified relevant oncologic reporting frameworks to guide the creation of a draft template and lexicon by the LELEX executive committee. Panelists were surveyed to assess current reporting practices and preferences between free-text and structured reports. Consensus (i.e., agreement by more than 80% of panelists) on the final lexicon and reporting system was reached through post-survey panel discussions. Results: Compared with a traditional free-text report, a structured report incorporating the LELEX lexicon received significantly higher ratings for precision and was deemed better for guiding clinical decisions by > 88% of panelists. In post-survey discussions, consensus was achieved for all lexicon components, including diagnostic certainty terms, lesion count descriptors, and longitudinal comparison language. The structured report template was also agreed upon by the panel members. Conclusion: The LELEX initiative established a consensus-driven structured reporting system and lexicon for general oncologic imaging baseline and follow-up assessments.
Indexed as
Decision makingFollow-up studiesLongitudinal studiesMedical oncology/educationMedical records/standardsNeoplasms/diagnostic imagingRadiology/educationRadiology information systemsTerminology as topicUncertainty
Identifiers
PMID41815273
PMCPMC12974414
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390