ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The neurological implications of metacognition.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging psychiatric and educational metacognition: a perspective on insight and learning.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review synthesizes current understanding of metacognitive processes across neuroscientific, clinical, and educational domains. Metacognition, defined broadly to encompass knowledge/awareness, and monitoring/regulation of one's cognitive processes spans both neurological and psychological domains. This quality holds significant implications for human development. Neuroimaging evidence suggests that metacognition relies on distributed networks spanning prefrontal-parietal circuits, with connections to the anterior cingulate and hippocampus. These regions demonstrate experience-dependent structural changes, as well as regulate the cognitive processes that drive neuroplastic behavior. The bifurcated model of metacognition, which distinguishes between metacognitive knowledge and regulation, represent an embodied perspective of a prediction based problem-solving framework that can be used to inform the development of clinical and educational interventions seeking to support neurodiversity. Evidence suggests that targeted intensive cognitive training may produce neural changes through well-characterized neuroplastic mechanisms. However, establishing causal links between metacognitive training specifically and structural brain reorganization requires additional research with appropriate neuroimaging protocols and control conditions. These converging lines of evidence establish a metacognitive problem-solving axis encompassing neural, cognitive, and behavioral functioning as the primary mechanism for controlled psychobiological reorganization. By focusing an individual's powers of problem solving upon their own development and understanding of their own problem-solving process, clinical interventions can be developed that are less coercive and more supportive of individual neurodiversity. The neurological implications of metacognition suggest that individuals can be supported in developing the optimal environments, procedures, and pedagogies to improve their learning and development, in turn affecting their underlying neurological architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.