SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Impact of educational agents on student's learning outcomes: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Virtual Pedagogical Agents and Instructional Content Type on Learners' Experience in Online Learning: Evidence from Behavioral, Eye-Tracking, and EEG Data.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- What Platform Scores Miss: Multidimensional Evaluation of AI Teaching Agents in Medical Education.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With the deep integration of artificial intelligence technology in the field of education, educational agents as an intelligent teaching tool possessing interactive and personalised characteristics have drawn increasing attention for their impact on learning outcomes. Methods: This study employs a meta-analysis methodology to systematically synthesise 52 empirical investigations published in internationally authoritative journals between 2015 and 2025. It examines the overall effect of educational agents on student learning outcomes, their specific manifestations at cognitive and non-cognitive levels, and the influence of moderating variables such as types of agents, subjects, sample size, and academic level. Results: Findings indicate that educational agents exert a significant positive influence on student learning outcomes. Regarding cognitive abilities, they demonstrate moderate to substantial enhancement effects on creative thinking, academic performance, and communication skills, while their impact on spatial ability and problem-solving skills falls below statistical significance. Regarding non-cognitive abilities, learning motivation and learning attitude showed significant enhancement, whereas the effects on learning engagement and learning interest were smaller and non-significant. Moderation analyses indicated that the impact of educational agents was particularly pronounced among chatbots, universities, small-scale settings, and engineering technology disciplines. Discussion: This study reveals limitations in educational agents' cultivation of complex abilities and personalised adaptation, providing empirical evidence for their precise application and optimised design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.