Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41815236›Full record

ArticleSexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP2026

Time Pressures and Sociocultural Constraints Affecting Access to Early Abortion Care Under Texas' "6-Week" Ban.

Kari White, Whitney Arey, Anna Chatillon, Anitra D Beasley, Cecili Chadwick, Asha Dane'el, Ophra Leyser-Whalen, Tracy A Weitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kari WhiteResound Research for Reproductive Health, Austin, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6463-8626
Whitney AreyUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
Anna ChatillonResound Research for Reproductive Health, Austin, TX USA.
Anitra D BeasleyResound Research for Reproductive Health, Austin, TX USA.
Cecili ChadwickUniversity of Texas, El Paso, El Paso, TX USA.
Asha Dane'elAustin, TX USA.
Ophra Leyser-WhalenUniversity of Texas, El Paso, El Paso, TX USA.
Tracy A WeitzAmerican University, Washington, DC USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In 2021, Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB8) prohibited abortion after detection of embryonic cardiac activity and was often referred to as a "6-week ban." Limited evidence exists about how these laws intersect with people's processes seeking pregnancy confirmation and navigating barriers to abortion care. Methods: Between October 2021 and August 2022, we recruited Texans ≥ 15 years of age who were seeking abortion using online ads and flyers placed in out-of-state abortion-providing facilities. Participants completed in-depth interviews, and we coded transcripts using inductive and deductive coding. This analysis explores participants' discussions of time needed for pregnancy confirmation, decision making, and access to care in the context of SB8. Results: Most of the 107 participants identified their pregnancy soon after a missed period, but they often sought additional pregnancy confirmation, which delayed care. Participants expressed urgency around their search for abortion after learning about the "6-week ban." Those who experienced financial, transportation, and work-related barriers felt there was insufficient time to get in-state care; others felt rushed to make a decision. Many recounted difficulties scheduling in-state appointments and were upset when facility staff denied care based on medical conventions for pregnancy dating and detection of cardiac activity before 6 weeks' gestation. Discussion: Framing SB8 as a "6-week ban" created stress among Texas abortion seekers, and the accumulation of small delays limited access to in-state care. Policy Implications: Clearer messaging around when abortion is prohibited and free, accessible pregnancy confirmation services inclusive of all care options would better support pregnant people's abortion care navigation.

Indexed as

AbortionAbortion restrictionsAccess to carePregnancy confirmationPregnancy decision making

Identifiers

PMID41815236
PMCPMC12971780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.