ArticleTranslational cancer research2026
Development and validation of a ferroptosis-related gene signature for prognostic prediction and therapeutic target identification in invasive lobular carcinoma.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 15% of breast cancers and presents challenges such as chemotherapy resistance and poorer survival outcomes compared to other subtypes. While often managed similarly to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), ILC requires tailored approaches due to its distinct biology. Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of cell death, shows potential in overcoming therapeutic resistance but remains unexplored in ILC. This study aimed to identify ferroptosis-related molecular subtypes, develop a robust gene signature using machine learning, construct an integrated prognostic model, and uncover potential therapeutic targets for ILC. Methods: This study integrated data from a total of 490 patients with ILC across four datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC), and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The TCGA cohort was utilized for model development, while the remaining cohorts served for independent external validation. ILC samples were classified into two subtypes based on the expression levels of ferroptosis-related genes via consensus clustering. The associations between the subtypes and the tumor microenvironment (TME), biological function, and mutation were assessed. A ferroptosis-related gene signature (FRGS) was developed using the integration of machine learning. A prediction model was subsequently constructed by combining the FRGS with clinical features. Sensitivity analysis and molecular docking were used to identify potentially effective targets and drugs. Results: We identified two ferroptosis-related subtypes and found that Cluster 2 had increased immune cell infiltration. By integrating machine learning, we identified 10 hub biomarkers of ILC and developed a FRGS. The FRGS was proven to be an independent risk factor for overall survival. Combining the FRGS with clinical features, a stable and superior ILC prognostic model was constructed. Sensitivity analysis and molecular docking revealed that Conclusions: By integrating multi-omics analysis, machine learning and molecular docking, we established a robust prognostic model for ILC, revealed two distinct ferroptosis-related molecular subtypes, and identified potential therapeutic targets and candidate drugs. These findings may help advance the development of personalized medicine and targeted therapies for ILC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.