ArticleLiver cancer2026
Stable Disease without Tumor Shrink Cannot Benefit from Surgery following Immune-Based Therapy in Potentially Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Liver cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Response as a Novel Efficacy Endpoint in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver cancer · 2026Article
- When Resectability Emerges After Systemic Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Proposed Response-Guided Consolidation Framework.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The criteria for identifying patients with potentially resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at the baseline stage have helped identify patients who are more likely to achieve successful conversion. However, the suitable timing and selection of candidates for conversion surgery after systemic therapy remained underexplored. Methods: Based on real-world evidence, we analyzed a cohort of 222 patients with potentially resectable HCC treated with immune-based therapy between January 2019 and May 2024. The treatment response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) and modified RECIST (mRECIST). Depth of response (DpR) was defined as the maximum tumor shrinkage from baseline, based on the sum of the longest diameters, as assessed by an independent review facility per RECIST v1.1. Conversely, stable disease (SD) with a DpR < 0%/> 0% was categorized as SD_shrink/SD_non-shrink. Survival outcomes were compared between patients who underwent surgery and those who did not, with different DpRs, and assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: A total of 85 patients with partial response (PR), 86 with SD_shrink, and 51 with SD_non-shrink were included in this study. Generally, patients who underwent surgery had a better prognosis than those who did not ( Conclusion: DpR is an important factor in choosing the right candidates and the timing of conversion therapy. Patients only at a DpR <0% receiving various immune-based treatments who met the "potentially resectable" criteria can benefit from surgical resection. These findings can help increase the success rate of conversion therapy in patients with advanced HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.