ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Loneliness as a sex-specific risk factor for cognitive aging.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Loneliness has emerged as a robust risk factor for adverse cognitive outcomes, including accelerated cognitive decline and increased dementia risk. However, accumulating evidence suggests that the cognitive consequences of loneliness may be sex-specific, with women experiencing disproportionate exposure, vulnerability, and downstream effects across the life course. This mini-review synthesizes epidemiological, psychosocial, and neurobiological evidence linking loneliness to cognitive aging in women, highlighting sex differences in prevalence, social role exposures (e.g., caregiving, widowhood), stress responsivity, and neuroendocrine and inflammatory pathways. Findings from longitudinal cohort studies are reviewed, demonstrating stronger associations between loneliness and cognitive decline in women, alongside emerging mechanistic research implicating hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation, immune activation, and hippocampal vulnerability. Critical gaps in aging neuroscience, including limited sex-disaggregated analyses and undermeasurement of relational and social variables, require urgent attention. A sex-sensitive framework for integrating loneliness into cognitive aging research and prevention strategies, emphasizing targeted assessment and intervention approaches that reflect women's lived social contexts, holds promise for advancing precision prevention in women's brain health. Framing loneliness as a modifiable, sex-specific risk factor offers a novel avenue for precision prevention in women's cognitive aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.