Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41815078›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

(Re)considering Discourses of Risk and Responsibility Through the Lens of Healthism: Interpreting the International Response to a Global Health Strategy for Noncommunicable Diseases.

Tim Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tim BrownDepartment of Geography and Environmental Science, School of Society and Environment, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health crises such as the global epidemic of so-called 'lifestyle diseases' are often framed as the failure of individuals to make the right health-related choices or to take responsibility for managing their bodies in ways that promote the health of present and future selves. Through his early writings on healthism, Robert Crawford was one amongst a number of scholars who documented the emergence of neoliberal logics of self-care in response to these perceived failings. Although these debates are well covered in the critical literature, less attention has been paid to the ways in which the central tenets of healthism were and are received as ideology travels from place to place. This paper seeks to address this lacuna through a detailed analysis of the discourse surrounding the World Health Organization's 'Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health'. Chosen for its framing of lifestyle diseases as a global public health problem whose causes are rooted in the spread of the 'western lifestyle', the paper argues that a focus on the strategy and the international response to it is revealing for what it tells us about what happens when ideas and theories travel.

Indexed as

Global HealthHealth PolicyNoncommunicable DiseasesSocial ResponsibilityHumansLife StylePublic HealthWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID41815078
PMCPMC12980289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.