Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814953›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026

Text Mining of CVD Synthesis Recipes for 2D Materials.

Ang-Yu Lu, Richard A Chen, Aijia Yao, Meng-Chi Chen, Ji-Hoon Park, Tianyi Zhang, Xudong Zheng, Nannan Mao, Jiangtao Wang, Zhien Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ang-Yu LuDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-0156
Richard A ChenDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Aijia YaoDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Meng-Chi ChenDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Ji-Hoon ParkDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Tianyi ZhangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Xudong ZhengDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Nannan MaoDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jiangtao WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Zhien WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Tomás PalaciosDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jing KongDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Semiconductor Research Corporation 145105-21913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vast amount of scientific knowledge is embedded in journal articles as unstructured text, creating challenges for efficiently extracting detailed insights. Traditionally, expert-authored reviews summarize research progress, but they often struggle to capture the intricate synthesis protocols in individual papers and provide limited quantitative comparisons of experimental techniques. Recent advancements in machine learning, particularly natural language processing (NLP), have enabled automated text mining and information extraction. However, in materials science, most approaches have focused on refining model architectures rather than addressing domain-specific challenges such as data annotation and the extraction of complex synthesis details. We present a machine learning framework for extracting synthesis protocols of 2D materials, including graphene and TMDs, from publications spanning 1980-2022. By combining named entity recognition (NER) and extractive question answering (EQA), we retrieve both categorical and numerical synthesis parameters. Generative models are further used to summarize and generate experimental recipes, enabling knowledge transfer across material systems. Our domain-specific, fine-tuned models offer improved precision and interpretability compared to general-purpose approaches. This scalable framework helps unlock hidden insights from literature, supporting data-driven synthesis optimization and accelerating materials discovery.

Indexed as

2D materialschemical vapor depositionmachine learningnatural language processingtext mining

Identifiers

PMID41814953
PMCPMC13054107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.