ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026
Text Mining of CVD Synthesis Recipes for 2D Materials.
Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Applications of Machine Learning in Micro-Nano Materials Research: From High-Throughput Screening to Intelligent Design.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A vast amount of scientific knowledge is embedded in journal articles as unstructured text, creating challenges for efficiently extracting detailed insights. Traditionally, expert-authored reviews summarize research progress, but they often struggle to capture the intricate synthesis protocols in individual papers and provide limited quantitative comparisons of experimental techniques. Recent advancements in machine learning, particularly natural language processing (NLP), have enabled automated text mining and information extraction. However, in materials science, most approaches have focused on refining model architectures rather than addressing domain-specific challenges such as data annotation and the extraction of complex synthesis details. We present a machine learning framework for extracting synthesis protocols of 2D materials, including graphene and TMDs, from publications spanning 1980-2022. By combining named entity recognition (NER) and extractive question answering (EQA), we retrieve both categorical and numerical synthesis parameters. Generative models are further used to summarize and generate experimental recipes, enabling knowledge transfer across material systems. Our domain-specific, fine-tuned models offer improved precision and interpretability compared to general-purpose approaches. This scalable framework helps unlock hidden insights from literature, supporting data-driven synthesis optimization and accelerating materials discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.