ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2026
Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Patients under Biologic Therapies: A Spanish CLINI-AEDV Multicentre Study.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-TNFα agents have been associated with the reactivation of granulomatous infections, including leishmaniasis. Cases of atypical or recurrent cutaneous (CL) or mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL) have been reported in patients on biologics. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a multicenter database to describe the clinical characteristics and management of CL and MCL in patients receiving biological therapy in an endemic area. Clinical features, diagnostics, therapies, and outcomes were analyzed. Seventy-one patients were included (63 CL and 8 MCL). The most common underlying condition was inflammatory bowel disease (33.8%). Lesions were multifocal in 40% and larger than 1 cm in 94.4%. Treatment failures were more frequent in MCL (50%) than CL (8.1%). Biologic therapy was discontinued in 53.5%, leading to worsening of the underlying disease in 44.7%. No significant difference in cure rates was observed between patients who continued vs. discontinued biologics (p=0.868). These findings highlight the clinical burden of CL and MCL in patients undergoing anti-TNFα therapy and suggest that discontinuation of biologic therapy did not significantly impact cure rates, emphasizing the need for standardized strategies balancing infection control and underlying inflammatory disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.