ArticlePsychiatry investigation2026
Is Longer Always Better? Clinical Validation of the Korean Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale With a Comparison of 5-Item Versus 11-Item Versions.
Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale (ASRM) has been recommended as a brief and psychometrically promising tool for the self-reporting of (hypo)manic symptoms. However, there is a shortage of validation in clinical samples, and none for the newly developed 11-item version. Thus, this study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the ASRM-11 in comparison with the ASRM-5.
methodsThrough a retrospective chart review, self-reported data on the Korean ASRM (K-ASRM) were collected from 122 patients diagnosed with either bipolar or depressive disorder via a (semi)structured diagnostic interview. They were interviewed individually using the Korean Young Mania Rating Scale (K-YMRS). The reliability, construct, convergent, and diagnostic validity were also examined.
resultsThe reliability of both versions of the K-ASRM ranged from good to excellent. Factor analyses revealed a unifactorial solution for K-ASRM-5, while a dual-factor structure emerged for K-ASRM-11, corresponding to the bright and dark sides of (hypo)mania. Moreover, both versions demonstrated a significant positive correlation with the total K-YMRS score. In the receiver operating curve analysis, the discriminating ability of both versions was fair when distinguishing manic from non-manic patients.
conclusionBoth the K-ASRM-5 and K-ASRM-11 demonstrated comparable levels of sound psychometric properties, which supports their continued usage in research and clinical practice. It is necessary to test potential utility of the K-ASRM-11 for symptom monitoring and treatment response because of its additional coverage of dark-side (hypo)manic symptoms, including irritability and impulsivity, which are considered important for the quality of life of patients with bipolar disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.