Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814783›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2026

Capillary Zone Electrophoresis for the Analysis of Phenolic Preservatives in Plasma and Insulin Formulations Using Salting-Out Assisted Liquid-Liquid Extraction.

Meriem Dadouch, Yoann Ladner, Catherine Perrin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meriem DadouchDépartement de Pharmacie, Faculté de Médecine Taleb Mourad, Université Djillali Liabes de Sidi Bel Abbès, Sidi Bel Abbès, Algérie.
Yoann LadnerInstitut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron (IBMM), UMR 5247-CNRS-UM-ENSCM), Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Catherine PerrinInstitut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron (IBMM), UMR 5247-CNRS-UM-ENSCM), Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

University of Sidi Bel Abbes
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenolic preservatives are critical excipients in biopharmaceutical formulations such as insulin and its analogs. The determination of these analytes in insulin formulations and human plasma is crucial for various applications. This study reports the first use of a method combining salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction (SALLE) with capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). The CZE-based separation of phenolic preservatives remains particularly challenging, as the alkaline conditions required for adequate resolution lead to elevated electric current and accelerated capillary deterioration. Analytical parameters, including the nature of the background electrolyte (BGE) and ionic strength, were optimized to ensure reliable separation of phenol, m-cresol, and the internal standard. SALLE was performed using acetonitrile (ACN) as the extraction solvent and ammonium acetate as the salting-out agent. CZE separation was completed in less than 6 min using a carbonate buffer at pH 10.3. The SALLE procedure yielded good recoveries (96%-102%) and repeatability (relative standard deviation [RSD] for concentration determination < 5.5%). The SALLE-CZE-UV methodology showed excellent linearity (r

Indexed as

InsulinLiquid-Liquid ExtractionPhenolsPreservatives, PharmaceuticalCresolsElectrophoresis, CapillaryHumansLimit of DetectionLinear ModelsReproducibility of ResultsCresolsInsulinPhenolsPreservatives, Pharmaceuticalcapillary zone electrophoresishuman plasmainsulin formulationsphenolic preservativessalting‐out assisted liquid–liquid extraction

Identifiers

PMID41814783
PMCPMC13084966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.