Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814571›Full record

ArticleCognitive science2026

Harnessing Uncertainty: Improvisation as a Model for Rapid Behavioral Expansion.

Julien Laroche, Alessandro D'Ausilio

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julien LarocheEuroMov DHM, Université Montpellier, IMT Mines Alès.
Alessandro D'AusilioCenter for Translational Neurophysiology of Speech and Communication (CTNSC), Italian Institute of Technology (IIT).

Funding

Horizon Europe GA101120727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While traditional sciences treat uncertainty as an obstacle to be minimized, this paper proposes an epistemic shift: viewing uncertainty as a resource to leverage. To enact this shift, we suggest adopting improvisation-where novel behaviors are instantaneously assembled to meet unpredictable constraints-as a model for real-time adaptation and behavioral expansion. In this practice, uncertainty is not merely managed but deliberately injected to disrupt the determinism of habitual routines. By unveiling a wider space of potential paths, increasing uncertainty fosters behavioral exploration, discovery, and collective decision-making amidst dissent. This perspective resonates across scales: in neuroscience, neural uncertainty is increasingly recognized as a hallmark of cognition and volition; in artificial systems, cultivating the models' inherent indeterminism can disrupt their biased attraction toward users' expectations, boosting the open-endedness of human-model interactions and fostering cognitive emancipation. In an era of systemic unpredictability, exploring the functional utility of uncertainty through the lens of improvisation is a timely necessity for understanding natural, psychosocial, and artificial systems. We present a general overview of empirical support for this framework, the promises of this emerging perspective, and the future directions it calls for.

Indexed as

CognitionDecision MakingModels, PsychologicalHumansUncertaintyCollective behaviorCoordination dynamicsCreativityImprovisationInteraction dynamicsUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID41814571
PMCPMC12979965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.