ArticleCognitive science2026
Harnessing Uncertainty: Improvisation as a Model for Rapid Behavioral Expansion.
Article in Cognitive science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While traditional sciences treat uncertainty as an obstacle to be minimized, this paper proposes an epistemic shift: viewing uncertainty as a resource to leverage. To enact this shift, we suggest adopting improvisation-where novel behaviors are instantaneously assembled to meet unpredictable constraints-as a model for real-time adaptation and behavioral expansion. In this practice, uncertainty is not merely managed but deliberately injected to disrupt the determinism of habitual routines. By unveiling a wider space of potential paths, increasing uncertainty fosters behavioral exploration, discovery, and collective decision-making amidst dissent. This perspective resonates across scales: in neuroscience, neural uncertainty is increasingly recognized as a hallmark of cognition and volition; in artificial systems, cultivating the models' inherent indeterminism can disrupt their biased attraction toward users' expectations, boosting the open-endedness of human-model interactions and fostering cognitive emancipation. In an era of systemic unpredictability, exploring the functional utility of uncertainty through the lens of improvisation is a timely necessity for understanding natural, psychosocial, and artificial systems. We present a general overview of empirical support for this framework, the promises of this emerging perspective, and the future directions it calls for.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.