Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814471›Full record

Trial reportAnatomical sciences education2026

Comparison of examination performance and test anxiety during bell-paced and self-paced gross anatomy laboratory examinations.

Danielle C Bentley, Angelo Sotto, Peter Lombardi

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Danielle C BentleyDivision of Anatomy, Department of Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4675-6036
Angelo SottoDivision of Anatomy, Department of Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8925-3922
Peter LombardiHuman Biology Program, Faculty of Arts & Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4448-2611

Funding

University of Toronto
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pacing during anatomy laboratory examinations may influence both student performance and test anxiety. This study compared bell-paced (BP) and self-paced (SP) timing structures to assess their impact on students' test performance, test anxiety, and pacing preferences. Undergraduate students (N = 35) across two academic years completed two anatomy laboratory exams under randomized crossover conditions: bell-pacing (60 s/station, forward progression signaled by bell) and self-pacing (balanced for total time, student-directed forward progression). A modified State-Trait Anxiety Inventory measured three novel anxiety metrics: anticipatory test anxiety (pre-exam), consequent test anxiety (post-exam), and reactive test anxiety (pre-post change). Mixed-effects models assessed effects of pacing condition on exam performance and test anxiety (anticipatory and consequent), controlling for repeated measures. Open-text student feedback was thematically analyzed. Exam performance was consistent between pacing conditions (BP: 82.8% ± 6.8%; SP: 81.1% ± 8.1%, β = 2.07, 95% CI [-2.45, 6.58]). Although the overall pacing effect on test anxiety was not significant, post-hoc comparisons revealed that the BP condition significantly increased mean reactive test anxiety (M = 5.67, p < 0.01), whereas SP did not. Despite that, most students (23/35; 66%) still preferred bell-pacing. Qualitative student feedback revealed that BP offered organization and familiarity, while SP provided flexibility and autonomy. Most students paradoxically preferred a pacing structure that made them more anxious, suggesting that preferences need not necessarily align with an associated psychological benefit. These findings underscored the complexity of assessment design and the importance of considering both academic and psychological outcomes in this process.

Indexed as

AnatomyAnxietyEducational MeasurementTest AnxietyCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultanatomy/educationanxietyeducational measurementexaminationsmedical educationstudentsundergraduate education

Identifiers

PMID41814471
PMCPMC13184586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.