ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026
Current practice of colposuspension in the United Kingdom: Results of a national survey.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionColposuspension procedures have increased in the UK following the 2018 suspension of vaginal mesh for stress urinary incontinence. However, significant variation exists in preoperative assessment, patient selection, surgical approach, and postoperative care. This survey aims to explore current national practice. MATERIAL AND
methodsA questionnaire was distributed to members of the British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) and the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS).
resultsFifty-three clinicians responded; most were gynecologists with a special interest in urogynecology (60%) or urogynecology subspecialists (34%). Response rates were 12% (51/442) among BSUG members and <1% (2/2622) among BAUS members. Annual case volume was 5 to 10 for 43%, fewer than 5 for 36%, 10-20 for 19%, and >20 for 2%. Most surgeons (85%) perform preoperative urodynamics in all patients, while 15% restrict testing to women with mixed symptoms. Almost all (98.1%) would treat detrusor overactivity or symptomatic overactive bladder prior to offering colposuspension. Forty-five percent will perform colposuspension at any functional or maximum cytometric capacity; others use cutoffs of >400 mL (19%), >300 mL (26%) or >200 mL (10%). Fifty-five percent reported a BMI limit of <35, while 19% have no limit. Most surgeons favored an open approach (58%), followed by laparoscopic (38%) and robotic (4%). Sutures were usually suspended tension-free (75%) using Ethibond (53%) or PDS (40%), with 72% consenting for the use of non-absorbable sutures. For open colposuspension, two sutures bilaterally were preferred (49%), followed by three (40%) and four (11%). Laparoscopic or robotic procedures were mostly intra-peritoneal (89%), with surgeons placing two sutures bilaterally (88%) and tying their knots extracorporeally (75%). Thirty-nine percent close the peritoneum over their sutures. Routine check cystoscopy was performed by 60%. Postoperatively, indwelling urinary catheters are mostly left on free drainage (69%); 17% always use a suprapubic catheter and 4% preferred clean intermittent self-catheterization. Trial without catheter is most commonly attempted on Day 1 post-colposuspension (74%), with variable voiding criteria and acceptable post-void residuals.
conclusionThis national survey highlights marked heterogeneity in UK colposuspension practice. There is a need for comparative studies and national consensus on core technical steps to ensure safety and favorable long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.