Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814458›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026

PPI in LifeMap-QUEST: an example of co-producing videos in different languages to support inclusion in a clinical study.

David C Clayton, William B Nicolson, Sarah Anthony, Rachel Hobson, LifeMap-QUEST PPI Advisory Group, G André Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David C ClaytonCardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK. dcc25@leicester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9278-9138
William B NicolsonCardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5718-8767
Sarah AnthonyCardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0121-861X
Rachel HobsonCardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
LifeMap-QUEST PPI Advisory Group
G André NgNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, BHF Leicester Centre of Research Excellence, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5965-0671

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR204553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recruiting participants into clinical trials is often challenging, particularly when trying to involve people from diverse or disadvantaged communities. This article describes how we co‑produced video resources to support inclusion in the LifeMap‑QUEST clinical study. LifeMap is a new approach to diagnosing people who may be at risk of Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD). Recognising the longstanding under‑representation of ethnic minority groups in research, and the barriers posed by language, literacy, and trust, the LifeMap‑QUEST Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Advisory Group worked with community partners and clinicians to develop participant information videos in English, Gujarati, and Hindi. This article explains how this collaborative process unfolded. As part of our co‑production approach, we tested AI translation tools such as ChatGPT. However, the translations produced were too formal, used complex terminology, and did not capture the tone or cultural context needed. We therefore adopted a collaborative method with a local charity, South Asian Health Action (SAHA), using forward–back translation, validation by native speakers within the PPI Advisory Group, and review by cardiac consultants who spoke Gujarati and Hindi. This ensured both accuracy and cultural appropriateness. Filming used a simple “talking‑head” style to create a friendly, approachable tone. Members of the PPI Advisory Group reviewed the videos and offered constructive feedback. The article highlights the challenges of developing participant information in multiple languages, emphasising the need for PPI, community partners, and expert clinical oversight. We hope that by describing what we did and the lessons we learnt, it will support others to make participant information videos in different languages.

Indexed as

Clinical trialsCo-productionEthnic minoritiesInclusionParticipant informationPPITranslationVideos

Identifiers

PMID41814458
PMCPMC13094232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.