ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Perceptual-motor performance and neural conduction asymmetries in elite basketball players.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07253623 (Perceptual-Motor Performance and Neural Conduction Asymmetries in Elite Basketball Players), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Perceptual-Motor Performance and Neural Conduction Asymmetries in Elite Basketball Players
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Follower arm muscle activity during the driver swing and its association with stroking performance in male golfers of different skill levels.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated whether the dominant hand would exhibit faster nerve conduction velocity, lower muscle activation latency, and superior Coincidence Anticipation Timing (CAT) performance compared to the non-dominant hand, reflecting enhanced neuromuscular efficiency and perceptual accuracy due to sport-specific training adaptations.
methodsThis study employed a single-group, between subject comparative design to examine perceptual–motor performance and neuromuscular activation characteristics of the dominant and non-dominant hands. CAT and basal electromyographic (EMG) measurements were obtained separately for each hand, followed by task-related CAT performance during which EMG signals were recorded simultaneously. Comparisons between dominant and non-dominant hands were performed using independent samples t-tests.
resultsThe dominant hand exhibited significantly greater AE and VE across general and nerve-specific measures (p < 0.01), with large to very large effect sizes, indicating differences in perceptual timing accuracy and consistency. Median nerve latency was shorter in the dominant hand, whereas median nerve amplitude did not differ significantly between hands. In contrast, ulnar nerve latency was longer and ulnar nerve amplitude was lower in the dominant hand, reflecting asymmetrical peripheral neural characteristics. Task-induced changes analyses demonstrated significant increases in nerve latency and reductions in amplitude in both limbs (p < 0.001), suggesting neuromuscular strain following task execution. Correlation analyses revealed weak-to-moderate associations between CAT errors and EMG parameters (r = 0.25–0.45), indicating that perceptual–motor performance is only partially explained by peripheral neuromuscular activation.
conclusionElite basketball players demonstrate distinct perceptual–motor and neurophysiological asymmetries between dominant and non-dominant hands. The integration of CAT outcomes with sEMG and nerve conduction measures provides a comprehensive approach for characterizing perceptual–motor performance and neuromuscular function. These findings may inform bilateral training strategies and neuromuscular monitoring practices aimed at optimizing performance and reducing neural strain in basketball players.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT07253623, Date: 11.19.2025. Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.