Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814367›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2026

The politics of breastfeeding: a feminist analysis of breastfeeding policies and promotion in Nigeria.

Vera Oko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vera OkoFaculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Feminist and Gender Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. voko015@uottawa.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the 1990s, global health policies have prescribed breastfeeding as an ideal and primarily positive practice essential to child survival and maternal health. In Nigeria, infant feeding policies have largely drawn on these global frameworks in promoting exclusive breastfeeding as a strategy against infant mortality. A FEMINIST ANALYSIS OF BREASTFEEDING POLICIES AND PROMOTION IN NIGERIA: Grounded in feminist ethics of care and the Ubuntu philosophy, this critique examines the contradictions between breastfeeding policies and maternal realities in Nigeria. The analysis identified the following: (1) a universalist approach in global and Nigerian breastfeeding policies that assumes breastfeeding is ideal and positively experienced by most mothers. (2) policies place breastfeeding at the top of the invisible hierarchy of infant feeding and pathologize quotidian maternal experiences by framing exclusive breastfeeding as ideal, and positive in most cases thereby marginalizing the challenges and costs many mothers face. (3) unaddressed gaps between policy directives and structural conditions in Nigeria such as underdeveloped social amenities, insufficient maternity leave laws and cultural realities, reinforce gender inequalities, erode maternal autonomy and influence breastfeeding practices.

conclusionThe gaps between breastfeeding policies and maternal realities in Nigeria highlight the need for policies discourse that are grounded in considering the challenges mothers face in breastfeeding. The review suggests ways to move beyond frameworks that treat infant care as solely a mother's responsibility by emphasizing the essential role of support in infant care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable N/A.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingHealth PolicyHealth PromotionPoliticsFemaleFeminismHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMothersNigeriaBreastfeedingInfant feeding policiesMaternalNigeria

Identifiers

PMID41814367
PMCPMC13003661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.