ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large tertiary center in the Czech Republic: three years' experience and future directions.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtracorporeal resuscitation (ECPR) has been shown to improve outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). It is, however, not the standard of care. The establishment of new ECPR centers is challenging, even though valuable lessons can be learned from more experienced centers. The primary objective of this study was to assess survival rates and neurological outcomes after ECPR. The secondary objective is to evaluate peri-ECPR parameters in relation to neurological outcomes, and to describe the long-term quality of life six months after ECPR.
methodsThis monocentric study involves patients with refractory OHCA transported to the hospital with ongoing mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for ECPR implementation at the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) Center of the University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic, from 1 January 2022 until the end of 2024. Outcome was assessed through analysis of data from the Ostrava ECMO Centre registry and long-term outcomes were evaluated using the SF36, EQ-5D-5L, and HADS questionnaires as retrospective study. The indication criteria and care standards were followed according to a local protocol.
resultsOver three years, 74 patients met the inclusion criteria for ECPR, with a cannulation success rate exceeding 93%. The median collapse-to-ECMO interval was 75 min. The survival to discharge from the intensive care unit was 39.1%, with 27.5% of patients discharged home and 33.3% survival after 6 months. Good neurologic outcome (cerebral performance category, CPC 1-2) on Day 30 post-arrest was observed in 29%. Overall, patients reported only low levels of pain, anxiety, and depression at 6 months post-arrest. The majority were completely self-sufficient, experiencing only minor problems with mobility or usual activities, with a median Quality-Adjusted Life Year/year of 0.90.
conclusionThe outcomes of the ECPR program in Ostrava are comparable with long-standing ECPR centers. Considering the interval collapse to ECMO was 75 min, the results were favorable, with good overall quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.