Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814356›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2026

Customizing infection prevention and control modules for combating healthcare-acquired infections in low-resource hospitals or resource-constrained healthcare settings: a local and global approach.

Ulhas Vasave, Amit Paroha

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ulhas VasaveDepartment of Programs, Americares India Foundation, Mumbai, India. uvasave@americares.org.ORCID 0009-0005-0974-3542
Amit ParohaDepartment of Programs, Americares India Foundation, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn resource-constrained healthcare settings such as in India, effective infection prevention and control (IPC) practices are essential for reducing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and enhancing patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate a customized IPC model implemented in Indian hospitals to address these challenges and improve patient safety. The model was designed to be replicable by other hospitals with similar objectives.

methodsThe multicenter pre-post quality improvement study was conducted across 11 Indian private tertiary hospitals from January 2022 to June 2023, with a 6 months preintervention phase (January-June 2022) and a 12 months intervention phase (July 2022-June 2023). Following the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, the study employed a stepwise methodology, including induction, HAI data collection, baseline assessments using WHO's Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) Assessment Framework (IPCAF) tool to evaluate IPC level, team formation, training, surveillance, and audit protocols. The intervention phase focused on comprehensive IPC training, virtual courses, and IPC surveillance. The project utilized the IPC model to enhance the methodology of implementing IPC, enabling transition over an 18-month duration.

resultsSignificant improvements were observed in IPC assessment scores, hand hygiene compliance, and adherence to IPC care bundles during the intervention phase. IPC assessment scores remarkably improved from a median of 78-97% (p = 0.004), with hospitals remaining in the advanced IPC level both pre and post intervention. Compliance toward hand hygiene improved from a median of 65% in the preintervention phase to 88% in the postintervention phase (p = 0.004). Significant improvement in compliance with IPC care bundles were observed for CAUTI (p = 0.016), CLABSI (p = 0.004), SSI (p = 0.010), and VAP (p = 0.037).Overall, HAI incidence rates remained consistently low during the study period with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between preintervention and postintervention rates; however, variability across individual hospitals highlights differences in settings and indicates further strengthening and standardization of IPC practices.

conclusionsThis quality improvement initiative highlights that a structured, WHO-aligned IPC approach can be practically adopted across Indian hospitals and can strengthen key IPC practices such as hand hygiene and care bundle compliance. With HAI rates already low at baseline and remaining stable over the study period, the findings primarily highlight the feasibility and scalability of such IPC programs across diverse healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionInfection ControlHand HygieneHospitalsHumansIndiaQuality ImprovementResource-Limited SettingsTertiary Care CentersWorld Health OrganizationAntimicrobial resistanceCAUTICLABSIHand hygieneHealthcare-associated infectionsIPCPatient safety SSIVAP

Identifiers

PMID41814356
PMCPMC13094052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.