ReviewJournal of medical case reports2026
A case of trigeminal nerve neurosarcoidosis initially presenting with isolated neurological findings mimicking trigeminal schwannoma: a case report and review of the literature.
Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSarcoidosis is a granulomatous inflammatory disease primarily affecting the lungs. Central nervous system involvement is rare, occurring in approximately 5-10% of cases. Isolated lesions of the cranial nerve, particularly affecting the trigeminal nerve, are even less common. These lesions can closely resemble more well-known tumors, such as trigeminal schwannomas, meningioma, and multiple sclerosis, which can complicate diagnosis when a solitary mass in Meckel's cave is the initial finding. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 45-year-old white man who presented with several months of right facial discomfort and numbness in the mandibular (V3) distribution consistent with trigeminal neuralgia. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed an avidly contrast-enhancing lesion in the right Meckel's cave along the trigeminal nerve. The patient underwent a skull base surgical exploration and resection. Histopathological, immunohistochemistry, and infectious screening of the resected tissue demonstrated noncaseating granulomas with no evidence of neoplastic or infectious etiologies. Lab work of angiotensin-converting enzyme levels and inflammatory markers were within normal limits. Importantly, the patient had presented with isolated trigeminal neurological symptoms, and thoracic abnormalities of mediastinal and hilar calcified lymph nodes with perilymphatic nodules were discovered only during the postoperative systemic evaluation prompted by the histopathological diagnosis. The patient started high-dose corticosteroid therapy following the operation, and his trigeminal pain and neurological symptoms improved substantially; he remained stable for the entirety of the 12-month follow-up duration.
conclusionThis case highlights the diagnostic challenges of trigeminal nerve lesion. There are no specific imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging that reliably distinguish neurosarcoidosis from tumors such as schwannomas or meningiomas. Therefore, neurosarcoidosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of contrast-enhancing Meckel's cave masses, even in patients without known systemic sarcoidosis. Tissue biopsy can be invaluable in determining inflammatory lesions and preventing overly aggressive resections. Once diagnosed, neurosarcoidosis is typically managed with high-dose corticosteroids and follow-up, often leading to symptom improvement. Timely histological confirmation and collaborative, multidisciplinary management are essential for achieving correct diagnosis and favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.